LL.M Dissertation 2025-26

Permanent URI for this collection

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

The Legal Status of “Producer” Under the GI Regime in India: A Jurisprudential Analysis
(NLUJAA, 2026) Aniket Jana
Geographical Indication (GI), it might seem a fairly easy prima facie, but the question is deceptive in its simplicity. When any consumer goes to buy a can of Darjeeling tea, a pure Kanchepuram silk saree, or a Scotch Whiskey, he or she is implicitly trusting the name on the label and has reason to believe that the product is a genuine one of a specific region or place and is produced by a group of people or community that carries the knowledge, skill and tradition that the product is known for. This belief or trust is the economic and moral foundation of the law of GI. The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 of India1 (hereinafter will referred as GI Act) was adopted and enacted on the backdrop of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), 19942. This agreement has a avowed policy that commits to empowerment in the rural area, while preserving the cultural integrity and the upliftment of economic status of the artisan communities. The Act creates a Sui generis regime that distinguishes between the “registered proprietor”3 and a “authorised user”4. This is the distinction that, prima facie, appears to be a functional administrative device, but upon the jurisprudentiaal scrutiny, this reveals a deep structural gap between formal ownership and substantive entitlement.